蒋昌建辩词分析（Jiang Changjians analysis）.docVIP

蒋昌建辩词分析（Jiang Changjians analysis） 1993 college debate finals, concluding four Fudan University say Jiang Changjian has become a milepost in Chinese debate. The pinnacle of both from the individual perspective, which is the statement in Chinese Debate outstanding quality. From the perspective of text, the simple meaning of words and the attack, needle see blood; from the angle of thoughts, the proposition that the evil of human nature of penetrating, delicate touch to write profound philosophical thinking; from the structural perspective, the argument, argument, sublimation of proper proportion, aggressive and perfect combination of reasoning from logic; the strict level, layers of depth; from the debate wind, elegant atmosphere, light; and more later debaters sigh, pondering over the end of both poetry and the spirit of the. Through these analysis, we can see the characteristics of a good node debate: logical content of beauty. Attractive beauty, artistic beauty, form of argument, grace and harmony of the debate and controversy. [Key words] With aggressive ideological debate debate. The text of the United States Air logic In 1993, the Fudan University to glory and dream to Singapore, in a very touching human nature debate after beat the National Taiwan University team, opened a new chapter in the domestic debate, and a lion city has since become the crowning glory of Chinese debate circles. The best defense: Fudan University four Jiang Changbian hands the first international debate Varsity Debate, with three of the summary statement to prove himself fully and delightfully, is indeed a debate on the king. Review the field between NTU and Fudan (NTU: debate about human goodness; Fudan: the evil of human nature), perhaps in the debate skills with todays look a bit awkward, but from the depth of thinking focus, both sides reached the elusive height, and a summary of Chang Jiang Jian heard people still widely sung, even sigh, is convinced. In the past fifteen years, in