ga,ha,wo用法（GA, ha, wo usage）.docVIP

ga,ha,wo用法（GA, ha, wo usage） A little, and the usage is ? two words in the sentence because of different definitions of Ga and WA often in a similar position, some people mistakenly think that this is not the difference between the two words. What does not know, the two from the auxiliary type is not the same type. Ga is the nominative case marking, is a; WA is that it not only can prompt the auxiliary, subject, object, adverbial can also suggest that, under certain conditions can also prompt complement. Therefore, they can sometimes play a similar role, but sometimes they are quite different. Different meanings in the question of subject and predicate Please look at the following two example sentences (the judgment sentence): A: Im in the classroom was. B: I was in the classroom, in advance. These two sentences translated into Chinese are here is the classroom.. But there are different meanings in japanese. The phrase a means that this place is a classroom, not any other room, such as a teachers room or a laboratory, etc.. The answer was: is, I was in advance. (where is this?) What is or was I was in advance of Ka (which is what room?) Problem. In other words, the answer to the question of the predicate has already been known. B sentence is to emphasize, only this is the classroom, other is not the classroom, such as: next to or opposite is not the classroom. The answer is , I was in the classroom. (where is the classroom?) Problem. That is to say, when the predicate is known, the answer to the subjects question is answered. Why is it such a different form? From the characteristics of the auxiliary word, it can only prompt specific content, and can not prompt interrogative words. Therefore, when the interrogative words in the subject part, can only use Ga questions, but not WA questions; the answer is this. On the contrary, interrogative words in the part, the prompt content has been clear, so the WA, instead of Ga, the answer is the same. So there is a saying ,