北京市西城区不同午餐方式教师健康体检结果比较.docVIP

北京市西城区不同午餐方式教师健康体检结果比较【摘要】 目的 了解北京市西城区教师健康体检相关指标,为有效的健康管理提供数据基础。方法 对北京市西城区普教教师2 952名进行健康体检,将教师分为在学校食堂午餐(有食堂组)和非食堂午餐(无食堂组)2组,比较2组间血脂、血糖、血压等相关指标与超声检查结果。结果 有食堂组教师血清高密度脂蛋白、总胆固醇明显高于无食堂组,血清葡萄糖、低密度脂蛋白明显低于无食堂组;其余检查项目差异无统计学意义。结论 不同午餐方式教师体检结果存在一定差异,在学校食堂就餐更具优势。 【关键词】 饮食习惯;血液化学分析;血压;脂肪肝;学生保健服务 【中图分类号】 G 478.2 R 153 R 194.3 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1000-9817(2009)09-0790-03 Physical Examination Results of the Teachers with Different Lunch Modes in Xicheng District in Beijing/QIANG Qin-chen. School Health Care Institute of Xicheng District in Beijing, Beijing (100037), China 【Abstract】 Objective To know the relationship between the lunch mode and result of physical examination of the teachers in Xicheng District in Beijing, and to provide evidence for effectively health manage. Methods All the teachers in Xicheng District in Beijing who accepted physical examination from September 2007to August 2008 were divided into two groups: having lunch at school dining room and not having lunch at school dining room. Their blood test results and the ultrasound results were analyzed. Results The HDL and CHO level of the teachers who had lunch at school dining room were higher than those who didnt’t have lunch at school dining room,but the GLU and LDL were lower.Conclusion There is difference between the teachers’ physical examination results according their lunch mode, the school cafeteria has its advantages. 【Key words】 Food habits;Blood chemical analysis;Blood pressure;Fatty liver;Student health services 教师是人类灵魂的工程师,是国家教育的重要资源。保障教师的身心健康,将有利于保持我国教育事业持续又好又快发展。为了解午餐方式对教师健康的影响,笔者对北京市西城区2007-2008学年度健康体检结果进行分析,并对不同午餐方式教师健康体检的相关指标进行比较。 1 对象与方法 1.1 对象 以北京市西城区2007-2008学年度进行健康体检的全体在职教师为研究对象,共调查教师2 952名,其中男性539名,女性2 413名;在学校食堂午餐的教师2 020名(男性403名,女性1 617名),非食堂午餐的932名(男性136名,女性796名)。年龄男教师≤60岁,女教师≤55岁。 1.2 方法 1.2.1 实验室检查 于体检当日早晨空腹采集血标本,使用日立7080全自动生化仪测定血糖、血脂等各项生化指标。采用葡萄糖氧化酶法测定血糖,酶终点法测定三酰甘油和胆固醇。试剂来源于上海科华试剂公司。 用汞柱台式血压计进行血压测定,取坐位测量右上臂肱动脉血压。 B超检查于体检当日空腹仰卧位检查肝、胆、胰、脾、肾。使用仪器为西门子G50超声