全新版大学英语4第一单元详尽版分析.ppt

Listening Practice 1. link 2. burnt their crops and villages 3. exaggerate the significance 4. at the end of their resources Based on a comparison-and-contrast analysis of the two invasions, what conclusion can you draw from their campaigns? a. The elements of nature must be reckoned with in any military campaign. b. Favorable natural conditions, advantageous location and support of people will contribute to the victory of one campaign. c. Arrogance usually leads to the defeat of one campaign. d. Humankind could make good use of natural conditions. Pride comes before a fall. G R _ Part Division of the Text 1 Text Organization Parts Para(s) Main Ideas 2 1 1~2 Introduction — Both Napoleon’s and Hitler’s military campaigns failed because of the severity of the Russian winter. 3~11 Napoleon’s military campaign against Russia. G R _ Part Division of the Text 2 Parts Para(s) Main Ideas 3 12~20 Hitler’s military campaign against the Soviet Union. 4 21 Conclusion — The elements of nature must be reckoned with in any military campaign. G R _ 2_4 Questions and Answers 1. What happened to Napoleon’s Grand Army when it was retreating from Moscow? The Russians launched hit-and-run attacks on the French from fields and forests. On the other hand, the temperature dropped to minus 4 degrees Celsius and Napoleon’s army didn’t have enough clothes, food and shelter. 2. Why didn’t the Russian people defend their homeland in the face of Napoleon’s offensive? They would like to take advantage of their nature situation to fight for them. G R _ 2_4 Questions and Answers 3. What tactics did Hitler use in his invasion of the Soviet Union? He planned to use the tactics called blitzkrieg, or “lightning war”, which had defeated the rest of Europe. 4. What was the significance of the battle of Stalingrad? It was one of the most important battles. It ended Germany’s ongoing offensive against the Soviet Union, and along with the second Battle of El Alamein paved the way for Naz