腰围测量3种方法比较探究.docVIP

腰围测量3种方法比较探究【摘要】 目的 比较肚脐上缘1 cm处的水平面(方法1)、腋中线髂骨上缘与第十二肋骨下缘连线的中点(方法2)、经肚脐水平位绕腰1周(方法3)3种腰围测量方法对儿童青少年的测量结果,为儿童青少年腰围测量方法研究提供依据。方法 使用3种腰围测量方法对北京市东城区某2所小学六年级196名小学生进行测量,并使用生物电阻抗测量其中72名目测超重学生的脂肪百分比和腹部肥胖情况。结果 3种腰围测量方法结果之间差异有统计学意义(P0.05),方法1的标准差最大。变异系数显示,方法2的区分度最好,方法1次之;方法2所得腰臀比与生物电阻抗的腰臀比结果最接近,方法1次之;方法1与腹部肥胖的相关性最好,方法3次之;方法3与脂肪百分比的相关性最好,方法1次之。结论 在肚脐上缘上1 cm的水平面上进行腰围测量的方法在综合性和对腹部肥胖度的反映上优于其他方法。 【关键词】 身体测量;肥胖症;腰臀比;研究方法;学生保健服务 【中图分类号】 R 179 R 339.3+5 R 195 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1000-9817(2009)09-0846-03 A Comparative Study on Three Kinds of Waist Circumference Measure Methods/SONG Yi, MA Jun, LI Shan-shan, et al. Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing(100191), China 【Abstract】 Objective To compare child and adolescent waist circumference measurement results by 3 kinds of measure methods(1,tape placed horizontally at the level of 1 cm aboveumbilicus; 2,tape placed midway between the lower rib margin and iliac crest at the minimum circumference; 3,tape placed and at the level ofumbilicus), and to provide basis for child and adolescent waist circumference measure method research. Methods Measure waist circumference of 196 grade 6 primary school students from 2 primary school in Beijing by 3 kinds of measure methods mentioned above, and 72 overweight students by eye surveying were measured by bioelectrical impedence test for percent body fat and abdominal obesity status. Results There were significant differences between three kinds of measurements (P0.05). The first measure method standard deviation was maximum. The coefficient of variation showed that the second measure method differential validity was maximum, and the first method followed. The waist-to-hip ratio outcome by the second measure method was nearest to outcome by bioelectrical impedence test, and the first method followed. The first measure method had the highest correlation with abdominal obesity, and the third method followed. The third measure method had the highest correlation with