rolling circle amplification is more sensitive than pcr and serology-based methods in detection of banana streak virus in musa germplasm滚动循环放大比pcr和serology-based方法更敏感的检测香蕉条纹病毒的穆萨种质.pdfVIP

  • 9
  • 0
  • 约4.74万字
  • 约 7页
  • 2017-08-29 发布于上海
  • 举报

rolling circle amplification is more sensitive than pcr and serology-based methods in detection of banana streak virus in musa germplasm滚动循环放大比pcr和serology-based方法更敏感的检测香蕉条纹病毒的穆萨种质.pdf

rolling circle amplification is more sensitive than pcr and serology-based methods in detection of banana streak virus in musa germplasm滚动循环放大比pcr和serology-based方法更敏感的检测香蕉条纹病毒的穆萨种质

American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2012, 3, 1581-1587 1581 /10.4236/ajps.2012.311191 Published Online November 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ajps) Rolling Circle Amplification Is More Sensitive than PCR and Serology-Based Methods in Detection of Banana streak virus in Musa Germplasm 1 2* 3 1 Moses C. Wambulwa , Francis N. Wachira , Laura S. Karanja , Samuel M. Mutu

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档