石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的铅——微波消解与电热板消解比较试验.PDFVIP

  • 5
  • 0
  • 约1.2万字
  • 约 3页
  • 2017-08-29 发布于河北
  • 举报

石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的铅——微波消解与电热板消解比较试验.PDF

石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的铅——微波消解与电热板消解比较试验

西 南 农 业 学 报 2005 年 18 卷 3 期 362 Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences               Vol 18   No 3 文章编号 :1001 - 4829 (2005) 03 - 0362 - 03 石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定土壤中的铅 ———微波消解 与电热板消解比较试验 吴晓岚 ,马 蓉 ,王 艳 (成都市农业质量监测中心 , 四川 成都 610041) 摘 要 :用微波消解法与电热板消解法消解土壤标准样品 ,用石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定消解液铅含量 , 比较两种消解方法的精 密度和准确度。微波消解法的相对标准偏差为 2 91 %~4 11 % ,电热板消解法为7 38 %~1394 % 。与标准值的相对相差比 较 ,微波消解法低于 5 % , 电热板消解法高于 19 % 。微波消解法的测出值均高于电热板消解法。 关键词 :微波消解 ;原子吸收光谱法 ;石墨炉 ;铅测定 中图分类号:S1532    文献标识码 :A The comparison study on the microwave digestion method with the electricity plate digestion method in the determination of lead in soil by GFAAS WU Xiaolan ,MA Rong ,WAN G Yan (Agriculture Quality Supervisory and Testing Center of Chengdu City ,Sichuan Chengdu 610041 ,China) Abstract :Both the microwave digestion method and the electricity plate digestion were used by GFAAS in the determination of lead in soil ,and the precision and accuracy were compared The results were as follows : the relative standard deviation ( RSD) with the mi crowave digestion method were 2 91 % - 4 11 % , and those with the electricity plate digestion were 7 38 % - 13 94 % The relative differences compared with standard values were lower than 5 % for the microwave digestion method , and that for the electricity plate di gestion method were higher than 19 % The testing values of microwave method were higher than that of electricity plate method Key words :microwave digestion ; graphite furnace ; atomic adsorption spectrophotometry ; determination of lead   铅是无公害农业的主要重金属污染元素

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档