法律期末复习`.docVIP

If a hotel complies with a limiting liability statute and a guest’s property is stolen, what, if any, liability does the hotel have? The hotel will be liable for the full amount of the loss. The hotel will be liable only for the amount set by the statute. The hotel will have no liability. The hotel will be required to pay the guest double of the loss. Which of the following is not a required element of a bailment? Personal property Delivery of possession Acceptance of possession by the bailee A written agreement Under common law, which of the following accurately describes the general rule concerning the liability of a hotel when a guest’s property was lost or stolen. The hotel was strictly liable for the full value of the loss. The hotel was not liable regardless of the cause of the theft. The hotel was liable only if the negligence of its employees contributed to the theft. The hotel was liable only if its employees were grossly negligent. A guest discussed with the front desk clerk his concern over an expensive ring he brought to the hotel. The desk clerk recommended that he put the ring in the safe and advised the guest that, by doing so the hotel would be liable for the full value of the ring if it disappeared. The guest did as recommended. The ring was stolen from the safe. What, if any, is the liability of the hotel? The hotel is liable for the full loss. The hotel’s liability is limited by the amount set by statute for property in a safe. The hotel’s liability is limited by the amount set by statute for property in a checkroom The hotel has no liability for the loss. Which of the following is true. People without reservations cannot qualify as guests until they register. A customer at a bar qualifies as a guest. A person who has not decided whether to take a room in a hotel can, under certain circumstances, qualify as a guest even before deciding whether to register. A person who registers at a hotel using a false name cannot qualify as a guest. ED, when pac