non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in france非金融格兰特的利益冲突在学术评价的定性研究多个利益相关者在法国.pdfVIP

Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France 1,2,3 1,3,4 2,5 4 Hendy Abdoul *, Christophe Perrey , Florence Tubach , Philippe Amiel , Isabelle Durand- Zaleski6, Corinne Alberti1,2,3 ´ ´ ˆ ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ 1 AP-HP, Hopital Robert Debre, Unite d’Epidemiologie Clinique, Paris, France, 2 Universite Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Unite d’Epidemiologie Clinique, Paris, France, ´ ´ ˆ 3 INSERM, CIE 5, Paris, France, 4 Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Unite de Recherche en Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Villejuif, France, 5 AP-HP, Hopital Bichat- ´ ´ ´ ´ ´ Claude Bernard, Departement d’Epidemiologie, Biostatistiques et Recherche Clinique, Paris, France, 6 AP-HP, Departement de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement, ´ ´ ´ Unite de Recherche Clinique en Economie de la Sante, Paris, France Abstract Background: Peer review is the most widely used method for evaluating grant applications in clinical research. Criticisms of peer review include lack of equity, suspicio