逻辑推理类题型分析及解题技巧总结（Logical reasoning class question analysis and solution skill summary）.doc

逻辑推理类题型分析及解题技巧总结（Logical reasoning class question analysis and solution skill summary） In the history of logic has been represented by a Affirmative graphic. This is the so-called traditional logic logic matrix. See below: Against: different with false true Subcontrariety: really different with false Poor: really really false, false, no rest The contradictory relationship: a really a fake In 1 cases A law firm has 12 staff, about the firms staff has the following three judgments: (1) people can use the computer. (2) all the people will not use the computer. (3) the director will use the computer The judge only one is false, which of the following represents the correct number of computers will be used? People will use A12 People do not use B12 Only one person will not use C Only one person will use D Not exactly the E to determine how many people can use the computer Explanation: when according to the relationship of categorical proposition, (1) I (2) E is the judgment, judgment, so they are not really the same contradiction, there must be a fake. According to the given conditions of the stem, the judge only one is false, can launch (3) is true, so (1) is true, so (2) is false, according to the logic matrix, can know the right should be some people will use a computer, or all will make with the computer. (according to the equivalence relation between E and A, between I) So the answer is E. 2* a company financial department a total of 8 staff, including the director. The staff of 8, the following three concluded that only one is true: (1) there is cantonese. (2) are not cantonese. (3) the director is not cantonese. Which of the following is true? A.8 staff are from Guangdong province. B.8 staff are not cantonese. C. is not only a cantonese. D. is only a cantonese. E. cannot determine the number of cantonese. Interpretation: (1) I (2) O is a judge, judge, according to the logic matrix, and O can be really not the same as false, and by the following three concluded tha