Squeak and Rattle State of the Art and Beyond（吱吱声和喋喋不休的艺术）.pdfVIP

Squeak and Rattle – State of the Art and Beyond Farokh Kavarana and Benny Rediers , Defiance Testing Engineering, Troy, Michigan Modern trends in noise control engineering have subjected nature of SR, manufacturers have formulated numerous speci- the automobile to the “drained swamp” syndrome. Squeaks fications for SR performance of assemblies and subcompo- and rattles (SR) have surfaced as major concerns. Custom- nents. These efforts have naturally focussed on long term du- ers increasingly perceive SR as direct indicators of vehicle rability, considering the effects of multiple and simultaneous build quality and durability. The high profile nature of SR environments. Over the years, manufacturers have borne the has led manufacturers to formulate numerous specifications high cost of maintaining large shakers, four post simulators, for assemblies and components. Even so, a large majority of drive-in environment chambers and semi-anechoic chambers. buzz, squeak and rattle (BSR) issues are identified very late These high cost ‘legacy’ systems have helped to reduce SR, in the production cycle, some often after the vehicle is but only in the form of find-and-fix solutions that are slow and launched. Traditionally, the find-and-fix approach is widely costly. Hence, the need exists for a design approach that tar- adopted, leading to extensive BSR warranty bills. The design- gets SR. Significant gains can be achieved by approaching right-the-first-time approach must replace the find-and-fix SR from a design perspective upstream in the design and approach. Due to the vast breadth and depth of SR issues, a development cycle. A comprehensive survey reveals a scarcity comprehensive summary of the present state of t