议论文的结构与议论文写作技巧（The structure of argumentative writing and argumentative writing skills）.docVIP

议论文的结构与议论文写作技巧（The structure of argumentative writing and argumentative writing skills） According to the authors experience in marking the composition of the college entrance examination in the past two years, I find two interesting phenomena: First, most candidates write argumentative essays, and two are the vast majority of argumentative papers, unlike argumentative essays. The main manifestation is: 1, argumentative structure is not fit. If the argument is not put forward at the beginning, only a few arguments are written in the middle, but no arguments are made, and no arguments are made. Even in the enumeration of arguments, a large amount of linguistic descriptions and psychological descriptions have also appeared. 2, illogical thinking. As the argument on what is the first thing to think twice, according to the logic, the following argument should be focused on why should think twice to start, which is twice the importance, or twice can bring good results; but some students are focused on what is written before or how to think twice people feel awkward. 3, on the lack of adhesion between the arguments and argumentation argument, that is to say the matter, there is no analysis according to the. To this end, I believe that high school papers must take the following three steps: that is, structure fit, thinking into the grid, adhesion techniques. First, the structure of argumentative composition Argumentation, analysis of facts, reasoning, of course, must follow a certain law of thinking; this Law of thinking reflected in the external form of the article, that is, with a certain style of the article structure. How do you write argumentative essays? A discussion is based on the general problem of the mode of thinking, should be according to put forward the problem, analyze and solve problems (or Introduction, the theory and conclusion) composed of three large. The problem in the beginning to argumentative clearly put forward the central argument, analysis is in t