广州雅芳的人才测评中心（Guangzhou AVON talent testing center）.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约8.84千字
约 6页
2017-09-03 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

广州雅芳的人才测评中心（Guangzhou AVON talent testing center）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

广州雅芳的人才测评中心（Guangzhou AVON talent testing center）

广州雅芳的人才测评中心（Guangzhou AVON talent testing center） For AVON, leaderless group discussion can be investigated by measuring the leadership, including expression, thinking innovation, originality and the ability to persuade others, but can also be found in the discussion whether the candidates with professional skills. Guangzhou AVON recruitment in the basic study of two dimensions, one is hardware, such as “ ” education background, ability, knowledge, experience and work experience; the other is “ rdquo software; for example, concept, attitude, character, etc.. Branch manager according to the two aspects of the preparation of a structured interview, the candidate is now used to examine the behavioral aspects of quality is not with the company need, and then do some other such as this technology evaluation center or leaderless group discussion and case discussion to observe whether he has the behavior in the test in the process of. Beginning in 1996, AVON began developing the technology of the measurement center for the selection of regional operations managers. The company bought some tools from outside, and then revised it according to its actual situation. For AVON, in the evaluation center of this technology, the effect is better, there is no leading group discussion. Through this discussion, we can see who really played a leading role in the process. Generally speaking, we can judge from two aspects: first, the opinion of this person is accepted by most people and become the groups opinion, then this person is very convincing. The two is to see who in the group really contributed to the discussion. Some people may not be themselves, but he is trying to inspire everyone in this direction, and it can promote the process and make the process effective. Its also an ability. For AVON, leaderless group discussion can be investigated by measuring the leadership, including expression, thinking innovation, originality and the ability to persuade others, but can also be foun