analysis of interrupt contract negotiations responsibility（分析中断合同谈判的责任）.docVIP

Analysis of Interrupt contract negotiations responsibility Abstracts violates the principle of good faith without good reason interrupt contract negotiations, resulting in the trust have suffered the loss of trust interests, should be liable for damages. This responsibility should belong to the scope of responsibility of negligence on the Contracting theoretical positioning. Consultations responsibility for whether it constitutes interrupt contract to produce reasonable reliance, without good reason to interrupt consultations damage results, constitute the four elements of a cause and effect relationship between its compensation is limited to the loss of trust in the interests of a causal relationship with the consultations, but it does not fulfill the interests of the ceiling. The paper Keywords interrupt the constituent elements of the contract negotiations Contracting fault liability compensation range First, the problem of the proposed Contract dispute retrial case (a typical case interrupt contract negotiations. Zhirong with Hunan University Press in April 12007, Zhirong request Press, its publishing lt;lt; beginner writers talk about writing gt;gt; two but the manuscript has not been adopted, the Press immediately returned the manuscript and herewith not adopted because of the king to the courts. to request court decision and the economic losses caused by the defendant to compensate the defendant did not promptly returned the manuscript. court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim. Wang filed an appeal after retrial: court dismissed the retrial the applicant Wang Zhirong retrial. Zhu Xiujun v. the Beijing Jinghua Book Distribution Limited copyright dispute March 28, 2006, the Beijing company Zhuxiu Jun issue “asked him in writing to copy their creative title (tentative lt;lt; ancient Chinese statesman The the story gt;gt; six books. plaintiff will advance correction four manuscript disposable sent e-mail to the defendant, the defendant replied, “t