analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion(分析商标侵权反向混淆).doc

analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion(分析商标侵权反向混淆).doc

  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion(分析商标侵权反向混淆)

Analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion Abstracts reverse confusion as a new type of infringement of trademark infringement, adopted by the United States Court jurisprudence extracted from the Trademark Law of China does not specify reverse confusion, but judicial practice, this types of cases once the complex. reverse confusion how to identify the constituent elements to become an academic, judicial practice explore new problems. This paper from the trademark after the user’s position in the market will inevitably stronger than the earlier users, not to trademark after the user’s subjective malicious constituent elements, consumers of both goods sources confusion and effectively cause harmful consequences, both goods or services in the same or similar constituent elements for analysis and expectations of perfect China’s trademark legislation Significance. The paper Keywords reverse confusion trademark infringement forward confuse A trademark confusion reverse confuse Case (a reverse of the origin of the confusion from the public hearing on May 18, 2007, and twice in the 24th make the final decision on appeal the effective date, the Blue Storm - from media dubbed the “Mosquito strong words elephant” finally came to an end, the plaintiff’s claim is almost entirely be met, but this case has brought to people thinking is infinite case, the plaintiff Aino company is a small business in Lishui City, Zhejiang, December 14, 2003 approval of the registration trademark of the Blue Storm, apply to the top 32 commodities. subsequent Blue Wild in their own production and sales of products using the registered trademark of the Blue Storm Pepsi summer of .2005 theme of the same name, “Blue Storm” Higher People’s Court of Zhejiang Province promotion activities in December the same year plaintiff blue wild PepsiCo constitute trademark infringement grounds to the courts the case after two People’s Court finally came to a close. “Pepsi Blue Storm logo

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档