- 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion(分析商标侵权反向混淆)
Analysis of the the trademark infringement reverse confusion
Abstracts reverse confusion as a new type of infringement of trademark infringement, adopted by the United States Court jurisprudence extracted from the Trademark Law of China does not specify reverse confusion, but judicial practice, this types of cases once the complex. reverse confusion how to identify the constituent elements to become an academic, judicial practice explore new problems. This paper from the trademark after the user’s position in the market will inevitably stronger than the earlier users, not to trademark after the user’s subjective malicious constituent elements, consumers of both goods sources confusion and effectively cause harmful consequences, both goods or services in the same or similar constituent elements for analysis and expectations of perfect China’s trademark legislation Significance.
The paper Keywords reverse confusion trademark infringement forward confuse
A trademark confusion reverse confuse
Case (a reverse of the origin of the confusion from the public hearing on May 18, 2007, and twice in the 24th make the final decision on appeal the effective date, the Blue Storm - from media dubbed the “Mosquito strong words elephant” finally came to an end, the plaintiff’s claim is almost entirely be met, but this case has brought to people thinking is infinite case, the plaintiff Aino company is a small business in Lishui City, Zhejiang, December 14, 2003 approval of the registration trademark of the Blue Storm, apply to the top 32 commodities. subsequent Blue Wild in their own production and sales of products using the registered trademark of the Blue Storm Pepsi summer of .2005 theme of the same name, “Blue Storm” Higher People’s Court of Zhejiang Province promotion activities in December the same year plaintiff blue wild PepsiCo constitute trademark infringement grounds to the courts the case after two People’s Court finally came to a close. “Pepsi Blue Storm logo
您可能关注的文档
- analysis of the preservation of evidence notary infringement legal issues(证据保全公证的分析侵权法律问题).doc
- analysis of the pre-qin zhu family justice and benefit and inspiration of contemporary china(分析先秦朱当代中国家庭正义和效益和灵感).doc
- analysis of the preliminary status of young children in-service teacher(分析幼儿初步状态的在职教师).doc
- analysis of the prevention and containment of the detention center head prisoners prison pa attorney measures(分析预防和遏制的拘留中心负责人囚犯监狱pa律师措施).doc
- analysis of the primary mathematics teaching and student ability to ask questions of the correlation network analysis(分析小学数学教学和学生提问能力的相关网络分析).doc
- analysis of the power supply to improve coal mine safety and reliability analysis of composite measures(分析提高煤矿供电的安全性和可靠性分析的综合措施).doc
- analysis of the primary mathematics teaching the importance of the mathematical language(分析小学数学教学数学语言的重要性).doc
- analysis of the primary school language learning strategy(分析小学语言学习策略).doc
- analysis of the prison staff employment skills training face difficulties and countermeasures(监狱工作人员就业技能培训面临困难的分析和对策).doc
- analysis of the problem of financing smes yuanzhou(分析中小企业的融资问题的生态).doc
文档评论(0)