a survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies调查工具测量循证公共卫生机构的决策能力.pdfVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约6.09万字
约 9页
2017-09-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

a survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies调查工具测量循证公共卫生机构的决策能力.pdf

1、本文档共9页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

a survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies调查工具测量循证公共卫生机构的决策能力

Jacobs et al. BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12:57 /1472-6963/12/57 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies 1 2 3 4 5 2 Julie A Jacobs , Paula F Clayton , Cassandra Dove , Tanya Funchess , Ellen Jones , Ghazala Perveen , 2 3 6 7 8 Brandon Skidmore , Victor Sutton , Sarah Worthington , Elizabeth A Baker , Anjali D Deshpande and Ross C Brownson1,9,10* Abstract Background: While increasing attention is placed on using evidence-based decision making (EBDM) to improve public health, there is little research assessing the current EBDM capacity of the public health workforce. Public health agencies serve a wide range of populations with varying levels of resources. Our survey tool allows an individual agency to collect data that reflects its unique workforce. Methods: Health department leaders and academic researchers collaboratively developed and conducted cross- sectional surveys in Kansas and Mississippi (USA) to assess EBDM capacity. Surveys were delivered to state- and local-level practitioners and community partners working in chronic disease control and prevention. The core component of the surveys was adopted from a previously tested instrument and measured gaps (importance versus availability) in competencies for EBDM in chronic disease. Other survey questions addressed expectations and incentives for using EBDM, self-efficacy in three EBDM skills, and estimates of EBDM within the agency. Results: In both states, participants identified communication with policymakers, use of economic