accuracy of responses from postal surveys about continuing medical education and information behavior experiences from a survey among german diabetologists响应来自邮政调查精度对继续医学教育和信息行为的经验对德国糖尿病专家的调查.pdfVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约4.65万字
约 7页
2017-09-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

accuracy of responses from postal surveys about continuing medical education and information behavior experiences from a survey among german diabetologists响应来自邮政调查精度对继续医学教育和信息行为的经验对德国糖尿病专家的调查.pdf

1、本文档共7页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

accuracy of responses from postal surveys about continuing medical education and information behavior experiences from a survey among german diabetologists响应来自邮政调查精度对继续医学教育和信息行为的经验对德国糖尿病专家的调查

BMC Health Services Research BioMed Central BMC Health Services Research x 2002, 2 Research article Accuracy of responses from postal surveys about continuing medical education and information behavior: experiences from a survey among German diabetologists Sven Trelle Address: Research Group Medicine/Research Unit Biotechnology, Society, and Environment, University of Hamburg, Germany E-mail: trelle@uni-hamburg.de Published: 1 August 2002 Received: 12 April 2002 Accepted: 1 August 2002 BMC Health Services Research 2002, 2:15 This article is available from: /1472-6963/2/15 © 2002 Trelle; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This article is published in Open Access: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any non-commercial purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the articles original URL. Abstract Background: Postal surveys are a popular instrument for studies about continuing medical education habits. But little is known about the accuracy of responses in such surveys. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude of inaccurate responses in a postal survey among physicians. Methods: A sub-analysis of a questionnaire about continuing medical education habits and information management was performed. The five variables used for the quantitative analysis are based on a question about the knowledge of a fictitious technical term and on inconsistencies in contingency tables of answers to logically c