implementation of an evidence-based sepsis program in the intensive care unit evident or not实施以证据为基础的脓毒症项目的重症监护室明显与否.pdfVIP

Available online /content/13/5/193 Commentary Implementation of an evidence-based sepsis program in the intensive care unit: evident or not? Dominique M Vandijck1,2, Stijn I Blot1,3,4 and Dirk P Vogelaers1,3,4 1Department of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 2Department of Public Health and Health Economics, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 3Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4Department of Healthcare, University College Ghent, Keramiekstraat 85, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Corresponding author: Dominique M Vandijck, dominique.vandijck@ugent.be See related research by Girardis et al., /content/13/5/R143 Published: 7 October 2009 Critical Care 2009, 13:193 (doi:10.1186/cc8056) This article is online at /content/13/5/193 © 2009 BioMed Central Ltd Abstract Since the release of the SSC recommendations in 2004, the Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the most serious health consensus is that, although identifying patients with severe conditions and are associated with unwelcome clinical, social, and sepsis is a major challenge, it can now be addressed by strict economic outcomes. With the introduction of the Surviving Sepsis application of evidence-based clinical practices [3,4]. The Campaign guidelines, the campaign leaders aimed to reduce evidence-based therapies for patients meeting the clinical mortality from severe sepsis by at least one quarter by 2009 by definition of severe sepsis and septic shock include initiation means of