不同破碎方式下磨矿技术效率-中国有色金属学报.pdfVIP

25 9 2015 9 Volume 25 Number 9 The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals Sep. 2015 1004-0609(2015)-09-2565-10 1, 2 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3 1, 2 1, 2 (1. 450006 2. 450006 3. 110089) (HPGR)(CC) “” 2.0 mm 0.5 mm 0.5~2.0 mm − − TD451 A Grinding technical efficiencies in various comminution modes LIU Lei1, 2, CAO Jin-cheng1, 2, 3, LÜ Liang1, 2, 3, GUO Zhen-xu1, 2, YUE Tie-bing1, 2 (1. Zhengzhou Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Zhengzhou 450006, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Polymetallic Ores Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Land and Resources, Zhengzhou 450006, China; 3. College of Resources Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110089, China) Abstract: In consideration of overgrinding in grinding process, the grinding technical efficiency (E ) of comminuted t hematite products using a high-pressure grinding roller (HPGR) and a conventional cone crusher (CC) were comparatively studied. Compared with CC products, individual size distributions (ISDs) in HPGR product show a more significant “double-peak” characteristic. The results show that HPGR products are finer and have a wider full-size distribution because of the greater proportion of fines. HPGR products need a shorter grinding time and have a lower relative grindabili