法律与道德（Law and morality）.docVIP

法律与道德（Law and morality） I played this topic is to maintain social order to play mainly by morality or by law. I play with morality. Personal feeling, morality is better. Let me talk to you about our point of view and the other sides point of view. Morality: the universality of 1. morality. Morality can adjust the social relations which can not be adjusted by law. 2., morality is fundamental to problem solving. The law tends to solve problems through external forces, while morality relies mainly on inner beliefs to sustain it. This inner belief enables people to consciously abide by social morality, and social order can be maintained well. This place is our point of contact with each other. When we fight the example, but to know about the first spell example of striking, for example, but negative, the other party may give you a rebuttal by the appreciation of the decision. So we got the points (technical issues) at this point Whats third? I forgot. Law: 1., the law has coercive power, can crack down on illegal crime, and ensure the orderly conduct of social order. The 2. laws are unified, a unified standard to have the same belief in the whole society, offenders are attacked by law, morality and praise, there is no uniform standard, unethical lies in personal subjective. Here is the other and we exchange, we propose eight honors and eight disgraces, wujiangsimei and so on as a counterattack, and puts forward the interregional conflict of laws impact each other, the law also is not uniform (our clever argument four). 3., the law is the combination of self-discipline and heteronomy, and morality is only a single self-discipline. The others words make people feel that they are worth more than we are, but we have put forward the moral heteronomy, such as the role of the news media to refute. We won the game, because we are good at playing sensational, such as morality emotional words gave us more sensational space, our four node debate debate at present have goose bumps,