透视一事不再理原则在司法实践的适用（The application of the principle of one thing no longer reason in judicial practice）.docVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约1.76万字
约 11页
2017-09-21 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

透视一事不再理原则在司法实践的适用（The application of the principle of one thing no longer reason in judicial practice）.doc

1、本文档共11页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

透视一事不再理原则在司法实践的适用（The application of the principle of one thing no longer reason in judicial practice）

透视一事不再理原则在司法实践的适用（The application of the principle of one thing no longer reason in judicial practice） The application of the principle of one thing no longer reason in judicial practice Author: Gong Yu release time: 2011-06-01 14:12:35 Idem principle originated from the ancient Rome law on the right theory of consumption, at present, Chinas civil procedure law and there is no direct provisions of this principle, as a kind of import, idem principle and clearly defined in China has not yet been standardized. It should be said that in the theoretical circle, the one thing no longer reason is a familiar concept, but in practice, the understanding and application of the principle of no longer no matter has never been unified. This has led to the repeated acceptance of the same case by some courts and the occurrence of substantive adjudication. In fact, the referees divergence stems from the different perceptions of the issue. The author thinks that it is more appropriate to measure the scope of one thing with the same party and the same subject as the standard. 1, litigation time effect. The principle of one act no longer matters has already produced its effect when a party has brought a lawsuit, and it has forbidden the opposite party to file a lawsuit on the matter again. 2, the subject of litigation is the same. The same procedure, only the litigation department within the rights and obligations of the parties affected, as long as a litigation department within the party, whether it is done for the plaintiff and the defendant shall be subject to the idem principle of strict, but except for the independent right of third people, because it is not in the litigation is in. Some people think that the so-called subject agreement, that is, in the two proceedings in the same subject, and the same position in litigation. The author believes that, based on the same subject, the parties either as plaintiff or defendant as shall be filed a lawsuit again, because of the subject