金融研究论文都是废话(Financial research papers are bullshit).doc

金融研究论文都是废话(Financial research papers are bullshit).doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
金融研究论文都是废话(Financial research papers are bullshit)

金融研究论文都是废话(Financial research papers are bullshit) Financial research papers are bullshit This is a disturbing news: the vast majority of financial strategies that claim to be able to beat the market are virtually impossible to do. What is even more surprising is that many financial research papers that claim to have discovered the rules of the functioning of financial markets have found no real patterns. You cant believe what Im saying, but this is the conclusion of 3 American scholars, Campbell Harvey (Campbell, Harvey), Liu Yan, and Heqing Zhu. They issued the financial research paper is tantamount to throw a grenade, the most surprising is that Harvey is not what to non orthodox thought activists. He has been in the financial authority of the Journal The Journal of Finance (Financial Journal) as editor in chief. What is it? Many financial studies have tried to find out what the return on investment portfolio is. The first attempt to solve the problem led to the conclusion that the return on investment was consistent with the random walk hypothesis (random-walk, hypothesis). This hypothesis is a century ago by the mathematician Louis? (Louis Bachelier) Shirley Pakistan is proposed, the basic idea is: correct prediction of any price movements would be counterproductive, because if the price will obviously rise tomorrow, then the price will rise today; therefore, not possible to predict the price the trend of success. In 1960s, several researchers launched a second attempt at the issue, and they proposed a capital asset pricing model (CAPM): a higher risk portfolio would likely lead to higher returns. The argument seems to be true. Then, in 1992, Eugene Fama (? Eugene Fama, last year won the Nobel prize) and Kenneth (Kenneth French)? French found that there are 3 factors that affect the stock portfolio returns (i.e. the Fama French three factor model - - Translators note): market factors (systemic risk), scale factor (market capitalization listed companies (listed

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档