灵魂统治,企业文化终极管理培训实施（Soul governance, corporate culture, ultimate management training, implementation）.docVIP

灵魂统治,企业文化终极管理培训实施（Soul governance, corporate culture, ultimate management training, implementation） Your business has spent so much money on training, but after training, why did they choose to change jobs? After training, why are departments doing things differently? Why do you always have office politics? Why do you always for all aspects of enterprise power struggle and trouble? You need ultimate training, build your corporate spirit, order, and emotional order, and thats your culture. At present, as a kind of educational investment in various training supply and demand booming, but just unfolding, behind the bustling hidden enormous crisis: the lack of humanistic spirit, with artificial training content after cutting height. We believe that training should be based on the man-made objects, human centered spirit, which is the core of human life meaning and value concern, its essence is a kind of basic tonality to deal with people, including values, life philosophy, scientific spirit, artistic spirit and moral spirit, value, human feelings, human dignity as the ultimate ruler. The core is the ultimate training into the humanistic spirit, focus on people, regulate employee spiritual order and emotional order, staff centered around, inspire and mobilize the staffs enthusiasm, initiative and creativity to expand, so that every employee has reached the highest level of work is “ mdash — suicide; automatic, conscious, voluntary, spontaneous, devotion and efforts, diligence, conscientious, ” inner staff spontaneous work enthusiasm is inexhaustible, inexhaustible power, without self Fenti, in order to achieve the common development of employees and enterprises for the purpose of. To understand people is to be human centered We visited a lot of enterprises, and found that many enterprises on the wall or in the air, there are big slogans “ people-oriented, ” but “ people-oriented ” we really do? We know what is “ human ”? As an employee in an enterprise, his “ human ” iden