网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

从着作权法适用的角度谈对网络实时转播行为的规制.PDF

从着作权法适用的角度谈对网络实时转播行为的规制.PDF

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
从着作权法适用的角度谈对网络实时转播行为的规制.PDF

Abstract: There is great disparity regarding the regulation of network real-time transmission by copyright law. Relevant viewpoints can be summarized as the following two aspects: First, whether the rights of broadcast organizations and audiovisual producers can regulate the network real-time transmission; Second, does the network real-time transmission fall into the scope of the broadcast right or fall into the scope of “other rights” as enjoyed by copyright owners. This paper holds that under the current copyright law framework, neither the right of audiovisual producers nor the right of broadcast organization can regulate the network real-time transmission; whereas the behavior can only be regulated by copyright. The general provisions should regulate the real-time transmission of network broadcast audiovisual programs. There are two ways to regulate the real- time transmission of audiovisual programs initially disseminated by broadcast: one is incorporating the real-time transmission into the scope of broadcast right; the other is to use the general provisions. Both measures have a certain degree of rationality, however, considering the convenience in practice and the uniformity in judicial standard, the paper recommends the second option, i.e. using the general provision to regulate the real-time transmission of aud

文档评论(0)

sunyangbill + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档