.桂林毛村石灰土和红壤元素生物地球化学特征研究.pdfVIP

Guangxi Sciences 2006, 13( 1) :5864 * The Comparative Study of Biogeochemistry between Limestone Soil and Red Soil in Maocun, Guilin 1, 2 1 1 卢玫桂 , 曹建华, 何寻阳 1, 2 1 1 LU Mei-gui , C O Jian-hua , HE Xun-yang ( 1. ,541004; 2. , 545006) ( 1.Karst Dynamic Laboratory Ministry of Land and Resources, C GS,Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, China; 2.Liuzhou Institue of Environment Protection Liuzhou Guangxi, , ,545006,China) :, : 3, pH pH 2. 16,KNaBMo I , ; , , K ,,CuMo, , ; , pH ( 62. 5%) ,pH ( 62. 5%) ;, : :P593: : 1005-9164( 2006) 01-0058-07 Abstract We have compared and analyzed the total elements available elements the pH value and: , , organic compounds of rhizospheric soil between limestone soil and red soil The results are as fol-. lows.It was found that the total Ca content of limestone soil is threetimes larger than the red soil. T he pH value of limestone soil was higher than red soil,which is higher about 2. 16 units.T he total , , , . contents of elements in the limestone werehigher than thered soil except K Na B Mo and I s to the elements contents of plants,it was found that the plants living in limestone soil had higher ele- ment content than the plants living in red soil, but the content of K of plants from limestone was lower However the contents of trace elements in plants living in the red soil except Cu and Mo. , were much higher By analyzing the available element contents of rhizospheric soil it was found that. , the available contents of trace elements in limestone soil were mu