「泰始为断」的历史书写《晋书》限断的难题与陆机的新义.PDFVIP

臺大中文學報 第四十九期 2015 年 6 月 頁 99 ~ 128 臺 灣 大 學 中 國 文 學 系 「泰始為斷」的歷史書寫： 《晉書》限斷的難題與陸機的新義 謝　明　憲* 提　　要 晉初「《晉書》限斷」之議論，出現三種「起元」之說。此一現象顯示， 論述朝代開端發生了歧見，將會影響帝王的正當性。本文析論其中「泰始為斷」 的主張，何以成為此一論爭的最終抉擇。首先，探討三種「《晉書》限斷」的 區別，以及此一議題何以在陸機擔任著作之職後，再次掀起議論。其次，討論 「正始」、「嘉平」兩種起元模式的分別，與陸機否定「正始」、「嘉平」起 年的理由。其三，從「泰始為斷」之說，討論晉武帝對於自身「受命」的建構； 以及三國一統之後，歷史書寫對於「泰始」起元的重構，這將改變後世對於晉 初的描述。 關鍵詞 ：晉武帝、司馬懿、陸機、禪讓、革命 本文於 收稿， 審查通過。 103.12.18 104.05.13 國立清華大學中國文學系兼任助理教授。 ＊ DOI:10.6281/NTUCL.2015.06.49.03 • • 1 The Historical Writing of “Beginning with the Taishi Period”: The Beginning of the Jin Dynasty and Lu Ji’s New Interpretation Hsieh Ming-Hsien* Abstract There are three theories explaining the beginning of the Jin dynasty, which shows that judgments of a dynasty’s beginning can influence the legitimacy of an emperor. This article analyzes the theory that considers the Taishi period as Jin’s beginning and explains why it has become the final choice among the three theories. The content of this article is divided into three parts. The first part investigates the three theories and the reason why this issue becomes popular again after Lu Ji assumes the role of official historian. The second part compares the theories that respectively takes the Zhengshi period and the Jiaping period as the beginning of the Jin dynasty and explains why Lu Ji is against them. The third part examines the Taishi theory to discuss how the Emperor Wu of Jin constructs his legitimacy and how historians who reconstruct the Taishi theory changes later descriptions of the beginning of the Jin dynasty. Keywords : Emperor Wu of Jin, Sima Yi, Lu Ji, 　　　　 to abdicate the throne to a wise person, r