- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
外文翻译原文The Structure of Foreign TradeMaterial Source: Journal of Economic Perspectives Author: Elhanan HelpmanWorld merchandise exports amounted to $5.3 trillion in 1997 and exports of commercial services amounted to $1.3 trillion. These are unprecedented volumes that have expanded much faster than income in the postwar period. While trade grew at an annual rate of 2.6 percent during this period, output grew at only 1.5 percent. More than half of the volume of merchandise trade flows amongst developed countries and less than 15 percent flows amongst developing countries. The rest, about one third, represents North-South trade between developed and developing countries.What explains these large volumes of trade? Why do some countries export computers while others export footwear? Can exports of airplanes be explained in the same way as exports of paper products? Questions of this type have been examined for many years. In attempting to answer them, economists have developed an elaborate analytical apparatus that has been greatly enriched in the last two decades. They have used the insights from trade theory to examine ever richer data sets in order to discover systematic patterns of trade flows and to evaluate how well available theories match these data. Nevertheless, although we do have today better answers to some of these questions than our predecessors had 40 years ago, the evolving structure of world trade defies simple explanations. I describe in this paper what we know about foreign trade and in what ways our understanding has improved as a result of the last 20 years of research.The two-factor two-sector version of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory was extended in the 1960s and ’70s; Ethier (1984) offers a review of the literature at this time. These studies had a variety of purposes, but what is central for this paper is the fact that from these studies grew a surprisingly simple theoretical specification, in which two types of relationships could provide the under
文档评论(0)