- 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
科技英语word
课件1
我们来看看这个博弈可预测的均衡是什么。对A来说,尽管他不知道B作何选择,但他知道无论B选择什么,他选择“坦白”总是最优的。显然,根据对称性,B也会选择“坦白”,结果是两人都被判刑8年。但是,倘若他们都选择“抵赖”,每人只被判刑1年。(抵赖、抵赖)是最优的,因为偏离这个行动选择组合的任何其他行动选择组合都至少会使一个人的境况变差。不难看出,“坦白”是任一犯罪嫌疑人的占优战略,而(坦白,坦白)是一个占优战略均衡。
3. zero-sum games (Para.1)(非合作博弈)
A situation in which a gain by one person or side must be matched by a loss by another person or side. A game is said to be a zero-sum game if the total amount of payoffs at the end of the game is zero. Thus, in a zero-sum game the total amount won id exactly equal to the amount lost.
4. tic-tac-toe (Para.6)
A game in which two players alternatively put crosses(?) and circles(○) in one of the compartments of a square grid of nine spaces; the goal is to get a row of three crosses or three circles before the opponent does.
5. strategy of brinkmanship (Para.17)
Brinkmanship refers to the policy or practice, especially in international politics and foreign policy, of pushing a dangerous situation to the brink of disaster in order to achieve the most advantageous outcome, by forcing the opposition to make concessions.
Text Organization
Part One
Content questions:
1. What kind of games did early game theory mathematicians emphasize? What is the current research focus?
2. Are game strategies different from decisions made in a neutral environment? Why or why not?
Language Study
1. It attempts to determine mathematically and … a wide array of “games”. (para.1)
译文:它试图以数学和逻辑的方法来帮助博弈者作出决策,在一系列纷繁复杂的博弈中应采取何种策略来保证自身获得最大利益。
2. pioneer: v. to originate (course of action etc., followed later by others.) (para.2)
Eg. The new treatment for cancer was pioneered by the experts of state hospital.
Translate the following expressions:
1. mutual gain game and mutual harm game
互赢博弈和互败博弈
2. positive sum and negative sum
正和和负和
3. pure conflict
完全博弈
Part Two
Content questions:
How many types of strategic independence are there in the games? What’s the difference between them? Can you give some examples of these types?
2. What are the
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 数学四年级下册运算律复习课.pptx VIP
- [江苏]市政基础设施工程质量检测指引.docx
- 房屋建筑和市政基础设施工程质量检测指引(2022版).docx
- 最新小学数学单元素养作业设计模板.pdf
- Hasselblad哈苏相机X2D 100C User Manual - Simplified Chinese用户手册说明书(中文版).pdf
- 12S108-2真空破坏器选用与安装.docx
- 试卷合集4份2023届广东省佛山市高一数学下学期期末学业水平测试试题.pdf VIP
- 广东省汕尾市2020-2021学年高一下学期期末考试数学试题 .docx VIP
- 2020-2021学年广东省东莞市高一下学期期末考试数学试题.pdf
- 广东省中山市2024-2023高一下学期期末数学试题(教师版含解析).docx VIP
文档评论(0)