违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑.pdfVIP

下载本文档

129
0
约1.01万字
约 6页
2017-12-15 发布于贵州
举报
版权申诉

违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑.pdf

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑违法发包人与实际施工人的雇用者不成立劳动关系—“用工单位承担工伤保险责任”的质疑

Dispute Settlement 争议解决, 2016, 2(1), 1-6 Published Online March 2016 in Hans. /journal/ds /10.12677/ds.2016.21001 The Illegal Party Issuing Contract Can’t Establish Labor Relations with the Employer of Actual Construction Person —About “The Industrial Injury Insurance Liability Shall Be Borne by the Employer” Bin Liu Anhui Zhongj ia Law Office, Tongling Anhui th nd th Received: May 4 , 2016; accepted: May 22 , 2016; published: May 25 , 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Hans Publishers Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). /licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract In the cases of labor controversies and work-related injury certifications, some problems exist in the construction project contrat. Does the labor relation established between workers employed by the unqualified actual constructor—the contractor, sub-contractor and assigne—and the pre- vious actual constructor of illegal employer, illegal sub-contractor and assignee? Can the workers injured by labor be identified as work-related injuries? There exists conflict with the policy department regulations of Ministry of Labour and Social Security and judicial interpretation of the Superme People’s Count and provisions of the Contract Law and the Safety Production Law. The conflict leads to many misunderstandings in the judicial practice, so that the practice of this approach failed to unify. From the perspective of jurisprudential analysis and host law pro- visions, this aspect of the policy department regulations and judicial interpre-tation have a wrong place. We hope to get the attention of the relevant departments and thinking [1]. Keywords