- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
英国合伙企业法判例选
LAW OF PARTNERSHIP - NOTES OF CASES??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????
1.???? Winsor v Shroeder (1979) 129 NLJ 1266
???? Mrs Shroeder bought two houses with the intention of developing and re-selling them. ???? She found she had insufficient funds to proceed with the scheme, so agreed with Winsor, ???? a property dealer, to purchase the houses jointly and share the profits equally. It was said ???? that, while a single transaction was less likely to be regarded as a partnership, in this case ???? a partnership existed. The important consideration was not whether it was a single ???? venture but whether it was a commercial venture. ?
???? 2.?? Khan and another v Miah and others [2001] 1 All E.R. 282
???? Five people were involved in a venture to open a restaurant, in which one of the ???? defendants was to be the manager and another defendant and one of the plaintiffs were ???? to be chefs. Another defendant was brought into the venture because of his commercial ???? expertise. Various transactions were carried out in connection with setting up the ???? business, including opening a joint bank account, obtaining premises and engaging ???? contractors to convert them into something suitable for a restaurant. Furniture and ???? equipment were also purchased. Three of the parties had obtained a loan from the bank ???? to buy the premises and this covered 80% of the cost, with the remaining 20% to be ???? contributed by two of them. The relationship between the parties broke down and was ???? terminated before the restaurant opened. The restaurant was opened and the business ???? carried on by the defendants. The plaintiffs were claiming a share of the capital and ???? profits of the partnership. The House of Lords held that a partnership has existed from ???? the time that the parties embarked on transactions on behalf of the joint venture, and not ???? just from the time the res
文档评论(0)