耶鲁RobertShiller金融市场LectDiversificationandSupportingFinancialInstitutions.pptVIP

耶鲁RobertShiller金融市场LectDiversificationandSupportingFinancialInstitutions.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
耶鲁RobertShiller金融市场LectDiversificationandSupportingFinancialInstitutions

Lecture 5: Portfolio Diversification and Supporting Financial Institutions Portfolio Diversification All that should matter to an investor is the performance of the entire portfolio. Mean and variance of portfolio matter Law of large numbers means that spreading over many independent assets reduces risk, has no effect on expected return. Equally-Weighted Portfolio When Asset Returns are Independent Same Variance Same dollar value in each asset Rebalancing each period Portfolio expected return equals average of asset expected returns Portfolio standard deviation equals asset standard deviation divided by Square root rule Investment Companies as Providers of Diversification Investment trusts (before 1940s) Mutual funds (especially index funds) Closed end investment companies Unit investment trusts All these institutions can enable small investors to overcome transactions cost and lumpiness problems in achieving diversified portfolios Doubts about Diversification Complete diversification would imply holding much in fixed incomes, real estate, etc. But hasn’t stock market outperformed these? Equity Premium Puzzle Geometric average real stock market return 1871-1997: 7.0% (Siegel Table 1-1). Geometric average real fixed-income return 1871-1997: 1.7% (Siegel Table 1-2) Equity premium = 7.0%-1.7%=5.3% Puzzle: Why has equity premium been so high? Dominance of Stocks over Fixed Incomes? No thirty-year period since 1831-1861 when the return on either long-term or short-term bonds exceeded that on equities. (Siegel p. 15) Survey of Institutional Investors, Shiller, 1993 “There is no thirty-year period since 1860 in which US government bonds have outperformed stocks.” Have you heard roughly this claim (even if details, such as the use of 30 years) are different? 1. Yes, often 52% 2. Yes, once or twice 22% 3. No 26% But is Equity Premium Robust? Geometric average US real stock market return 1802-1997: 7.0% (Siegel Table 1-1) Geometric average real fixed income return

文档评论(0)

panguoxiang + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档