自己的总结+七宗罪之展开.doc

The argument that blabla omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument. The statement that follows the description of blabla simply describes what blabla will do. This alone does not constitude a logical argument in favor of blabla, and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument. Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of blabla, the use of blabla, or who is involved in the blabla. First, the argument assumes that the cause of the problem is that the A , the B, and the C are unknown. In a weak attempt to support its claim, the argument describes blabla that makes all of these things accurately known. But if the cause of the problem of blabla is that A, blabla will not solve the problem. Second, the argument never address A and how this will affect blabla’s objective of doing blabla. If A , blabla will not be avoided. Finally, if C, the problem of blabla cannot be solved by blabla. The argument also does not address what would happen in the event that D. Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above instead of solely explaining what blabla supposed does, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing. 开头 先陈述作者是如何通过某fact来argue了一个conclusion（这步可分为两句，第一句讲作者得出了什么conclusion——in this argument, the author makes a conclusion that……第二句写第一个fact——to justify this conclusion, the author points out that……） 作者用什么去支持了这个conclusion（第二个fact） 还有什么其他的fact是couple with上面的support的（第三个fact） 指出作者的argument是unconvincing的，有几点critical flaws。 Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things be