自己的总结+七宗罪之展开.docVIP

The argument that blabla omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument. The statement that follows the description of blabla simply describes what blabla will do. This alone does not constitude a logical argument in favor of blabla, and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument. Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of blabla, the use of blabla, or who is involved in the blabla. First, the argument assumes that the cause of the problem is that the A , the B, and the C are unknown. In a weak attem