行政不作为论文：行政不作为的理论界定与诉讼救济制度的完善.docVIP

行政不作为论文：行政不作为的理论界定与诉讼救济制度的完善 【中文摘要】行政不作为问题,不仅是司法实务界的难点,也是行政法学理论界的热点问题。行政不作为诉讼案件数量日益增多,但行政法学理论界对行政不作为的相关理论研究却很少。由于理论研究上的缺失导致司法实践中操作不一,本文通过对行政不作为的概念以及争议较多的几个热点问题进行分析和研究,以试图寻找适合我国国情的行政不作为理论和救济制度。全文共分六个部分：第一部分“行政不作为的概念”。这一部分探讨了行政不作为的概念,在归纳比较当前国内外各种观点的基础上,对其进行重新界定,并进一步分析了行政不作为概念所包含的具体涵义。第二部分“行政不作为的分类”。依照不同标准,对行政不作为的不同形态进行分类分析,并明确分类的法律意义。第三部分“行政不作为与不履行法定职责辨析”。从义务来源、表现形式、法律后果、裁判方式等方面与不履行法定职责比较,分析二者的区别,有利于对行政不作为概念更深层次的理解。第四部分“国外行政不作为诉讼救济制度介绍及评价”。通过对英美法系和大陆法系的行政不作为诉讼救济制度分析比较,肯定德国的课以义务判决对我国行政不作为诉讼救济制度的借鉴意义。第五部分“我国行政不作为诉讼现状”。介绍我国行政不作为诉讼制度在受案范围、起诉期限、举证责任、裁判方式等方面的现状,分析现有制度的缺陷和不足。第六部分“我国行政不作为诉讼救济制度的完善”。从充分保障当事人合法权益出发,对我国行政不作为诉讼制度中存在的缺陷进行分析探讨,并借鉴国外先进诉讼救济制度,对我国行政不作为诉讼救济制度的完善提出建议。 【英文摘要】The issue of administrative nonfeasance is not only the puzzle in the judicial practices but also the hot point in the administrative law academia. More and more nonfeasance cases heard by the courts but a few of the relative studies appeared in the administrative law theories. As the different opinions in the theories that cause the different judicial attempts, this paper would try to find a proper theory and the rescuing system fitting for the current situation through the analysis and the studies over the concept of administrative nonfeasance and the disputed problems.The whole context is divided into six parts:part one is the “concept of administrative nonfeasance”, which discusses the certain idea of administrative nonfeasance and the definition based on the various views abroad. Part two is the “classification of the nonfeasance”, which shows the analysis of the different forms of the actions and legal meanings of the detail classifications. Part three is the “comparison between the nonfeasance and the malpractice” from the following aspects as the origins, the formulations, the legal consequences and the judgments that helps the deeper understanding of this concept. Part four is the “introduction and evaluation about the litigation rescue system concerning the nonfeasance abroad, which apprais