保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛临床分析.docVIP

  • 3
  • 0
  • 约3.61千字
  • 约 4页
  • 2017-12-21 发布于上海
  • 举报

保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛临床分析.doc

保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛临床分析

精品论文 参考文献 保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛临床分析 武汉市黄陂区人民医院重症科 湖北武汉 430300 【摘 要】目的:观察保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛的临床疗效,并进行分析。方法:将161例不稳定心绞痛的患者随机分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组105例对照组56例,两组均给予常规治疗,包括硝酸酯类、肠溶阿司匹林、beta;- 受体阻滞剂、钙离子通道阻滞剂、血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂等药物,治疗组在上述治疗的基础上加用保心包贴膜,外敷心前区,每4天一贴,首次2贴。两组均以20天为一疗程。结果:治疗组在改善心绞痛临床症状、心电图及血液流变学指标方面均优于对照组(P lt;0.05)保心包贴膜治疗老年不稳定心绞痛疗效肯定,无明显副作用。结论:保心包贴膜在老年冠心病不稳定心绞痛防治方面副作用小,使用方便、简单、安全、有效,具有较好的临床价值。 【关键词】保心包贴膜;心绞痛;不稳定型;老年人 【 abstract 】 objective:to observe the bartender pericardium sticker the clinical curative effect of treatment of elderly unstable angina,and analyzed.Methods:161 patients with unstable angina pectoris were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,treatment group,105 cases of control group 56 cases,two groups were given conventional treatment,including nitrate,enteric aspirin,beta blockers,calcium channel blockers,angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blockers such as drugs,the treatment group on the basis of the above treatment combined with pericardial the paster,topical area before the heart,every 4 days post,2 for the first time.In the two groups is one period of treatment in 20 days.Results:treatment group in improving the angina pectoris clinical symptoms,electrocardiogram and blood rheology indexes were better than that in control group(P lt; 0.05)confirmed the pericardium sticker curative effect on senile unstable angina,no obvious side effects.Conclusion:the pericardium sticker on senile coronary heart disease prevention and treatment of unstable angina side effect is small,easy to use,simple,safe,effective and has good clinical value. 【 key words 】 keep pericardium film;Angina pectoris;Is not stable;The elderly 老年不稳定心绞痛中约60%表现为不稳定型[1],我们应用保心包贴膜治疗不稳定心绞痛疗效明显,现报告分析如下。 1 对象和方法 1.1 对象:自2014年9月一2015年10月,所选161例老年冠心病患者,均符合《不稳定心绞痛的诊断和治疗建议》[2]中的诊断标准,其中男性82例,女性79例。年龄40 - 70岁,平均(60plusmn;6)岁,合并高血压者26例,糖尿病者14例,高脂血症者28例。将161例患者随机分为两组,治疗组105例与对照组56例,两组在年龄、性别、合并症情况、发作特点、心电图改变及血液流变学指标均无显著性差异(Plt;

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档