江苏电信NGN承载网体系结构探索.pptVIP

一、对NGN承载网体系结构的思考 二、NGN承载网解决方案（IPTN） 三、国际标准化进展 网络控制架构的演变 对通信网控制体系的分类 ITU-T对“承载与控制分离”的考虑 BT对IP技术的深刻反思（一） Convergence does not mean: Only 1 IP layer controlling all services (e.g. GMPLS) Connectionless (CNLS) only (e.g. Internet). Connection Oriented (CO) only (e.g. ATM). Technology ? Service BT对IP技术的深刻反思（二） There are 3 networking modes that all technologies map into: CNLS e.g. IP, Ethernet. CO Packet Switch e.g. FR, ATM, MPLS. CO Circuit Switch (for bulk transport) e.g. SDH, PDH, OTN. We need all 3 modes to deliver all the services required by our customers: It is not a VHS v. Betamax popularity competition. BT对IP技术的深刻反思（三） CNLS delivers the Internet. CO-CS delivers the raw bandwidth circuits. Noting that: The size of the circuits we want to switch are getting larger. We’ll cease to circuit switch the smaller bandwidths ( VC4). Packet switching a flow that is large enough to be circuit switched is expensive. CO-PS fits the role for customers wanting the strong SLGs of circuits but wanting VC4 worth of bandwidth. BT对IP技术的深刻反思（四） The infinite bandwidth all the time solution! With some bandwidth squeezing mechanisms to compensate. Besides misses the point of what a connection is. BT对IP技术的深刻反思（五） The essence of a carriers service. It is what we manage to provide customer isolation identification. Transparent transport between end points of the network. The basis of performance guarantees on the probability of obtaining reliable transparent transport of information. The basis of end to end monitoring of the integrity of the transparent transport of the information. BT对IP技术的深刻反思（六） The “Architecturally Good” IP Friendly Label stacking Variable length frames Y.1711 OAM BT对IP技术的深刻反思（七） We need the capability to have both a packet view, and the packet’s parent connection view, to fully address the QoS, fairness, meaningfulness, charging problem across all types of service. There is a need for both CO-PS CNLS network operation in order to support both