ABUEG_EA 1986 ;” POPULAR PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING THE URBAN-POOR.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约5.18万字
约 21页
2018-01-04 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

ABUEG_EA 1986 ;” POPULAR PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING THE URBAN-POOR.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

ABUEG_EA 1986 ;” POPULAR PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING THE URBAN-POOR

Guide to Good Practice in Core Area Development DFID Research Project R 6860 Annex 1 Literature Review and Abstracts DRAFT WORKING PAPER by: Haryo Winarso Max Lock Centre University of Westminster 35, Marylebone Road London. NW1 5LS May 1998 ABUEG_EA (1986) ;” POPULAR PARTICIPATION IN HOUSING THE URBAN-POOR - SELECTED CASES IN METRO MANILA’., HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 1986, Vol.10, No.1-2, pp.197-206 [UCL LIBRARY] Abstract: The article discusses alternatives in providing an effective way for housing low-income families in Metro Manila. Some project discussed includes The BLISS (Bagong Limpunan Improvement of Sites and Services); DBB (Dasmarinan Bagong Bayan) and SCI (Sambahayan Condominium Inc.). The discussion includes some aspects of construction, financing and management of the project. It concludes that the lack of people participation in the projects has made the attempts fail in addressing the problems of housing for the poor. ADDAEDAPAAH_K, LEONG_KM., (1996)., “HOUSING FINANCE FOR THE AGING SINGAPORE POPULATION - THE POTENTIAL OF CREATIVE HOUSING FINANCE SCHEMES”., HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 1996, Vol.20, No.4, pp.625-634 [UCL LIBRARY] Abstract: After a review of Home Equity Conversion Scheme (HECS) within the socio-economic and cultural milieu of Singapore, it was concluded that the sale-leaseback scheme, if promulgated by the Singapore Housing and Development Board, could be the panacea for the housing-finance problem of the elderly. This paper continues the discussion by reviewing Creative Housing Finance Schemes (CHFS) in the light of the socio- economic and cultural parameters co-existing in Singapore. Whereas HECS seeks to resolve the housing-finance predicament of the elderly who stay put, CHFS seek to resolve the housing- finance problem for the elderly who move or want to move into a new house that is purpose-built for the elderly. The paper concludes that saleability of homes of the elderly is the main impediment to the successful implementati