- 1、本文档共23页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
美国科学资助机构对高风险探索性项目的资助机制研究-International
* * * * * * * Major Non-Consensus Program and its review process design Wang Yue; Li xiaoxuan Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences Zheng yonghe National Nature Science Foundation of China * May 21-23, 2012 Outline Background concepts Several typical reviewing mechanisms of science funding agencies in the world The suggestion of an interactive heuristic reviewing mechanism Major Non-Consensus Program * According to Kuhns paradigm theory, innovative research can be grouped into : normal innovation (promote the development of normal science) revolutionary innovation (challenge conventional scientific paradigm and lead to the paradigm shift) * Here, Exploratory Pioneering Research (EPR) generally refer to a class of basic research which are highly exploratory, relatively high-risk, pioneering and potentially transformative, belonging to revolutionary innovation in basic research. In NSFC, the most widely used review mechanism is the peer review. For normal innovations, using traditional peer review process could ensure fair. For EPR, using traditional peer review process seems too cautious and overly conservative, and the traditional peer review process may lead to reviewers’ non-consensus and some other problems. * It is stated that the traditional peer review mechanism is not the best mechanism to assessing EPR Project. At present, NSFC has not yet set up special funding projects for such research. There are some related funding practices such as Small Grant Exploration Project and Non-Consensus Project. Encountered some difficulties in their implementation process. One of the major reasons is the absence of an effective corresponding reviewing mechanism specifically for such projects. For NSFC now: How to protect and encourage scientists to apply for such research project? How to identify EPR effectively? * Outline Background concepts Several typical reviewing mechanisms of science funding agencie
您可能关注的文档
- 生态城评价指标的筛选模型及应用-JournalofNortheastern.PDF
- 生态城规划-天津大学研究生e-Learning平台.PDF
- 生态经济型防风治沙体系优化配置技术规程研究-中国沙漠.PDF
- 用心体味建筑之美——探寻建筑艺术的特点-珥陵中学.DOC
- 电子商务的应用框架与交易模式-Read.PPT
- 电子商务营运企划书-企业运筹与电子化中心.PPT
- 电子技能实训少引脚元器件的拆焊方法电子技能实训.PPT
- 电子课件现代玉器图案.PPT
- 电影事业处.DOC
- 电子商务网站建置-以鼎记南投陶笛为例.PDF
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——14.接线盒质量控制课件.pdf
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——41.组件固化工艺.pdf
- 《建筑装饰工程信息管理》课件——建设工程文件档案资料管理职责.pptx
- 《建筑装饰工程计量与计价》课件——基本建设预算分类和作用.pptx
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——13.铝型材质量控制课件.pdf
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——36.后外观检和EL测试工艺课件.pdf
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——12.光伏玻璃质量控制课件.pdf
- 《结构设计原理》课件——圆形截面偏心受压构件的正截面承载力计算-基本假定.pptx
- 《晶硅电池组件智造技术》课件——31.组件层压前返修工艺.pdf
- 《结构设计原理》课件——相对界限受压区高度.pptx
文档评论(0)