街区步行易达性评价_方法综述与案例研究_熊文.pdf

街区步行易达性评价_方法综述与案例研究_熊文.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
街区步行易达性评价_方法综述与案例研究_熊文

62 | 街道可步行性 街区步行易达性评价:方法综述与案例研究* Evaluation of Pedestrian Accessibility: Methods Review and Case Study 熊 文 刘 璇 阎伟标 关 丽 文章编号1673-8985(2017)01-0062-11 中图分类号TU981 文献标识码A 摘 要 伴随城镇化与机动化进程,中国城市街区与街道的步行环境受到了较大冲击,囿于步行环境评价方法的缺乏及片面强调小汽车 效率,行人的时空损失再大亦属无形。总结发达城市步行道网评价指标及方法,提出基于步行源、步行汇、步行集的GIS分析的街 道步行易达性评价方法,并以上海同济大学两个校区、北京丰台两个街道为例,结合步行时空阈值调查,对不同尺度下步行活动 的易达性进行了案例研究。结果表明,较之路网密度、形态等传统指标,重要公共设施的优化布局更加重要。 Abstract Along with the progress of urbanization and motorization, the construction of urban transport infrastructure in China has reached an unprecedented developing rate. However, one-sided emphasis on the efficiency of small vehicle and closed-end management makes the space of traditional urban blocks and alleys disappear, so the traffic environment is getting increasingly worse and pedestrians suffer all kinds of inconveniences and risks. This paper raises the pedestrian problem in China from the international perspective, summarizes the evaluation indexes and methods of pedestrian network in developed cities, and by using research methods of pedestrian accessibility in urban block on the collection of pedestrian source and picking three classical pedestrian activities based on the pedestrian walking threshold to study on the pedestrian accessibility of examples in different space and historical dimension: two urban blocks of Fengtai District in Beijing and two campuses of Tongji in Shanghai.The results show that, compared with the traditional indicators of road network density and shape, the optimization layout of public facilities is more important. 关 键 词 街区 | 步行易达性 | 步行质点 | 评价 Keywords Community | Pedestrian accessibility | Pedestrian particle | Evaluation 1 街区步行易达性评价方法综述 同弄堂未能列入市政道路范畴,因之“我国城 伴随TOD和新城市主义思想的发展,适宜

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

561190792 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档