浅析Lakoff的体验哲学.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
浅析Lakoff的体验哲学

On Lakoff’s Embodied Philosophy Philosophical Studies Language Studies (Relationship) Philosophical Divergence: Empiricism and Chomsky’s Rationalism Language Studies: the embodiment of the philosophical divergence, including 1. Observing the usage of language (Empiricism) 2. Viewing language as the innate gift of human beings (Rationalism) The Popular Study of Cognitive Linguistics The popular study of cognitive linguistics combines empiricism with rationalism, which is to study human mind and cognition based on the embodiment. Lakoff’s Embodied Philosophy What Lakoff elaborates in his book Philosophy in the Flesh— The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought differentiates from the above two traditional philosophical schools. He insists the Embodied Philosophy lays the philosophical foundation for cognitive linguistics. Embodied Mind Lakoff offers three complementary but distinct sorts of arguments in favor of embodiment. First, he argues that certain concepts, such as color and spatial relation concepts, which can be almost entirely understood through the examination of how processes of perception or motor control work.(人们在经验和行为中形成了概念和范畴,语义与此同时形成。) Second, based on cognitive linguistics’ analysis of figurative language, he argues that the reasoning we use for such abstract topics as warfare, economics, or morality is somehow rooted in the reasoning we use for such mundane topics as spatial relationships. Finally, based on research in cognitive psychology and some investigations in the philosophy of language, he argues that very few of the categories used by humans are actually of the black-and-white type amenable to analysis in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions. On the contrary, most categories are supposed to be much more complicated and messy, just like our bodies. * *

文档评论(0)

ligennv1314 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档