外文翻译--审计办事处规模，审计质量与审计定价毕业设计论文.docx

Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit PricingJong-Hag Choi, Chansog (Francis) Kim,Jeong-Bon Kim, and Yoonseok ZangSUMMARY: Using a large sample of U.S. audit client firms over the period 2000–2005,this paper investigates whether and how the size of a local practice office within an audit firmhereafter, office size is a significant, engagement-specific factor determining audit quality and audit fees over and beyond audit firm size at the national level and auditor industry leadership at the city or office level. For our empirical tests, audit quality is measured by unsigned abnormal accruals, and the office size is measured in two different ways: one based on the number of audit clients in each office and the other based on a total of audit fees earned by each office. Our results show that the office size has significantly positive relations with both audit quality and audit fees, even after controlling for national-level audit firm size and office-level industry expertise. These positive relations support the view that large local offices provide higher-quality audits compared with small local offices, and that such quality differences are priced in the market for audit services.Keywords: audit office; office size; audit quality; audit pricing.Data Availability: Data are publicly available from sources identified in the paper.The way we think about an accounting firm changes dramatically when we shift the unit of analysis away from the firm as a whole, to the analysis of specific city-based offices within a firm. In terms of DeAngelo’s 1981b argument, a Big 4 accounting firm is not so big when we shift to the officelevel of analysis. For example, while Enron represented less than 2 percent of Arthur Ander-sen’s national revenues from publicly listed clients, it was more than 35 percent of such revenuesin the Houston office.INTRODUCTIONAs alluded to in the above quote, the size of a city-based audit engagement office could be a more crucial determinant of audit