网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

I INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS:我的入门教材.doc

  1. 1、本文档共40页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
I INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS:我的入门教材

I. INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS GENERAL PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS--Property rights concern relations among people regarding control of valued resources Examples: Donor-donee (gift), Bailor-bailee (Bailment: Bailor gives the bailee rightful possession of goods even though he is not the owner. Bailee has duty to return it to bailor when bailor asks for it. i.e. coat check), Seller-buyer PROPERTY RIGHTS: Each right that accompanies ownership of property is limited by the rights of others 3 MOST COMMON: RIGHT TO USE: property owners generally have the right to use their property as they see fit so long as they do not use it in a way that violates the rights of others limitation: environmental laws prohibit the use of property in ways that harm neighbors and community at large by polluting) RIGHT TO EXCLUDE/INCLUDE: The essence of private property is the right of the owner to exclude others--the power to grant access to others and to revoke that privilege. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc. p. 87: Steenberg Homes had a mobile home to deliver and the easiest way was to drive it across Jacque’s land. Steenberg Homes asked the Jacques and they said no, but they did it anyway. The court held for Jacque because society has an interest in punishing and deterring intentional trespassers (preserving integrity of legal system—what is the point of having rights if nothing happens when someone violates them?) Limitation: discrimination based on race, sex, etc. is prohibited in public accommodations State v. Shack: Defendants entered onto private property to aid migrant farm workers employed and housed there. Having refused to depart upon the demand of the owner, the defendants were convicted of trespassing. The court held for the defendants because ownership of real property does not include the right o bar access to governmental services available to migrant workers. Held: if there is a private or public necessity, the right to exclude is limited State v. Shack applied to Jacque: Whe

文档评论(0)

ligennv1314 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档