实证期刊阅读报告EBM-styleJournalReading.PPTVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
实证期刊阅读报告EBM-styleJournalReading

報告人: PGY夏紹剛 Email:143920@cch.org.tw 指導臨床教師:何昌益醫師/謝堯棚醫師 日期:2009/10/29 地點:一般內科82討論室 Clinical Scenario (臨床情境) 個案為73歲已婚男性,有高血壓及糖尿病病史,右腳糖尿病足於97年9月接受高壓氧治療後痊癒,本次因雙足潰瘍已兩週入院,診斷為糖尿病足,右足壞疽嚴重經外科清瘡治療後,外科醫師建議植皮以加速復原,病人僅希望再次進行高壓氧治療不願植皮。?? Clinical Uncertainty → PICO 問題 對於糖尿病足部潰瘍患者,單純接受高壓氧治療相較於植皮是否仍有理想的復原能力? 臨床個案的PICO Patient / Problem Patient who has Type 2 DM with foot ulcers (foot ulcer or diabetic foot) Intervention HBO OR hyperbaric oxygenation Comparison skin graft or skin transplantation Outcome enhance the wound healing Type of Question: Therpy Search Terms Strategy: (搜尋關鍵字與策略) 資料庫: Pubmed 搜尋日期: 2009/10/23 搜尋關鍵字與隅策略: 如圖表 Best available evidence: (挑選可獲得之最佳研究證據) Citation/s: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes(2008) Lead authors name : R.J.Hinchliffe, G.D.Valk, J.Apelqvist, D.G.Armstrong, K.Bakker, F.L.Game, A.Hartemann-Heurtier, M.Londahl, P.E.Price, W.H.van Houtum,W. J.Jeffcoate The Study: (研究效度)- 1 Prospective and retrospective controlled studies, published in any language, that evaluated interventions for the treatment of chronic foot ulcers in people aged 18 years or older with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus were considered. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, control before-and-after (CBA) design and interrupted time series (ITS) designs were included. MEDLINE (1966 - 2006) EMBASE(1980 - 2006) The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register (2006) The Study: (研究效度)- 2 One reviewer assessed all identified references by title and abstract on the basis of patient group, intervention and outcome. Full paper copies of identified articles were then assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers (agreement was reached). Each included paper was further assessed by two reviewers, working independently, and information was extracted on study desig

文档评论(0)

zhuwo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档