【塞尔与德里达】对寄生性言语行为的一个辩护.docxVIP

BACK | HOME | VERSION FRAN?AISEDeconstruction and Speech Act Theory:A Defence of the Distinctionbetween Normal and ParasiticSpeech Actsby Kevin Halione-mailIn every serious philosophical question uncertainty extends to the very roots of the problem.We must always be prepared to learn something totally new.Wittgenstein, Remarks on ColourAbstractAcknowledgementsKey to AbbreviationsChapter One: IntroductionChapter Two: Speech Acts and their Happiness2.1 Austin’s Rejection of the Constative/Performative Distinction2.2 Austin’s Theory of Speech Acts2.3 Searle’s Theory of Speech Acts2.3.1 Searle’s Modified Analysis of the Speech Act2.3.2 Searle’s Criticism of Austin and Development of a Theory of MeaningChapter Three: Speech Acts and Parasites3.1 Austinian Parasites3.1.1 Unhappiness and Parasitism3.1.2 Reports and Reproductions3.2 Searlean Parasites3.2.1 Parasitic Reference3.2.2 Pretended Assertions3.2.3 Intention and Horizontal Convention3.2.4 Metaphor3.2.5 Double and Hybrid Illocutions3.3 ConclusionChapter Four: On the Impossibility of the Purely Serious4.1 Iterability4.2 Derrida and the Classical Theory of Writing4.3 Austin as Classical4.4 Deconstructed Speech Acts4.4.1 Iterability and Abnormal Contexts4.4.2 The Graphematic Nature of Locutions4.4.3 The Necessary Impurity of Performatives4.4.4 A Typology of Forms of Iteration?Chapter Five: On the Reducibility of Polysemy and the Control of Parasitism5.1 Terminology5.2 Meaning, Intentionality and Context5.2.1 Intentionality in Sec5.2.2 Meaning: Intentional and Contextual Sentence Meaning, Utterance Meaning: in Searle and Derrida Free Play, Dissemination and Literal Ambiguity Fungible Intentions and Meaningful Sentences5.3 Serious/Parasitic: Derrida contra Searle5.3.1 Parasiting Citations and Citing Parasites Citationality, Iterability, Parasitism and Idealization Quotability, Parasitism and Semantic Rules Non-Fiction/Fiction and Speech/Writing5.3.2 Axiologies and the Serious/Parasitic Distinction A Merely Strategic Disti