[高等教育]Lecture_Summary_749103605.pptVIP

(CMB+BAO+WL)%SN-CONSTITUTION More nearby and selected sub-sample of the Union SNIa at z1 Better agreement at z1 Indicates problems with Union high z sample 1s prediction Best SN fit LCDM SN best fit: ?m=0.29+/-0.02 CONSTITUTION (CMB+BAO+WL)%SN2009 Use SDSS SN sample at intermediate z More restricted selection of SNIa at high z Perfect agreement between CMB+BAO+WL prediction and SNIa +/-1s prediction Best SN fit LCDM SN best fit: ?m=0.29?0.02 Measure dw/dz = a challenge ! Motivation= separate the different theoretical interpretations A difficult estimate (sw’ 10 %) Hypothesis to control w=p/r parametrisation Other cosmoogical parameters Wm… Sensitivity to systematics to % A necessity .. Compare and combine probes Identify, evaluate and reduce systematical effects in as many complementary probes as possible CMB: Planck But do not expect much improvement on w(z). Check WMAP anomaly (cf Li Ti Pei’s presentation)? Type Ia Supernovae: dL(z) to z ? 1.5 Key issue is physics/evolution: do we understand SNe Ia? Weak lensing: G(t) to z ? 1.5 Promising; requires photo-z’s Key issues are fidelity, stability of psf, calibration Cluster counts: dA(z), H(z) - accuracy/non-linearities? Baryon “wiggles”: dA(z), H(z) to z=3 Late developer: cleanest but requires huge surveys AP test ISW effect Pairs of galaxies : Christian Marinoni + Adeline Buzzi (CPT+CPPM ) How can w(z) be better measured? 2015 CMB WMAP 2/3 WMAP 7 Planck Clusters AMI SZA APEX AMIBA SPT ACT DES Supernovae Pan-STARRS DES LSST SNLS-ESSENCE Spectroscopy SKA FMOS SDSS Imaging CFHTLS ATLAS KIDS JDEM LSST SKA SDSS SUBARU 2005 2015 SDSS XCS EUCLID 2010 2010 Subaru DLS LAMOST DES, VISTA Pan-STARRS Hypersuprime Surveys to measure Dark Energy KDUST BigBoss KDUST BOSS + SNF DE: future Need large full sky surveys New/improved probes testing basic cosmology assumptions AND studies of systematics Inconsistency with WMAP quadrupole determination? Due to quaternion interpolation offset: Liu a