FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS – AN OVERVIEW.docVIP

 PAGE 19 MONOGRAPH Function Relationships: An Overview Originally approved March 1999 SAVE International gratefully acknowledges John W. Bryant, CVS, FSAVE in the development of this Monograph.FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS – AN OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION: After completing the Random Function Definition and Classification tasks 1 the next step is to establish Function Relationships. For small scope projects (15 or less functions), the Numerical Evaluation is a practical and useful methodology. However, when the Random Function Definition process creates more than 15 functions to be evaluated, Numerical Evaluation becomes awkward. Two major techniques have been developed in the Value Methodology to create an understanding of the function relationships on larger scope projects. The first, a Function Hierarchy Logic model, is based on the breakout of functions similar to the tasks on a Work Breakdown Structure, ie: a tree style model. The second, Function Analysis System Technique (FAST), is based on intuitive logic. Both of these models can accommodate a large number of functions and typically require an analysis of the greatest opportunity for function improvement within the total project. These two models are the subject of separate monographs. They are described in this monograph on an overview basis and illustrated using the same project. THE PROCESS: ..”functional balance is that which makes a product work and sell most effectively at the lowest total cost… To start toward the attainment of this balance, we must first have an understanding of the relationships between all functions” 2. The comparison and evaluation process requires a complete understanding of the data gathered in the Information Phase including User/customer Attitudes and both primary and secondary source information. The simplest method of assigning relative importance is to assume all functions are equal. But that is rarely the case. One approach to establishing the relative importance i