题目石亭江流域土壤重金属来源及污染评价-SpringerStatic.DOC

Supporting Information Heavy metals in soils from a typical industrial area in Sichuan, China: Spatial distribution, source identification and ecological risk assessment Guiyin Wang 1, Shirong Zhang 1, *, Luoyi Xiao 2, Qinmei Zhong 2, Linxian Li 2, Guangrong Xu 2, Ouping Deng 2, Yulin Pu 2 a College of Environmental Sciences, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, China b College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang 611130, China *Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 028 Fax: +86 028E-mail address: srzhang01@ (S. Zhang). Number of pages: 7 Number of tables: 3 Number of figures: 3 Table S1 The parameters and the cross-validation results of the best-fitted semivariogram models for soil heavy metals Heavy metal Model Nugget (C0) Sill (C0+C) Nugget/ Sill (C0/ (C0+C)) Range (m) ME RMSSE Cu Exponential 47.89 347.58 0.14 1737 0.037 0.984 Zn Spherical 181.02 1374.86 0.13 1971 0.062 1.098 Cr Gaussian 25.09 42.65 0.59 2054 0.098 1.124 Cd Exponential 0.005 0.007 0.71 3461 0.000 1.004 As Gaussian 5.562 13.087 0.43 4425 -0.044 1.165 Hg Exponential 0.012 0.013 0.92 9302 -0.001 1.007 ME, Mean Error; RMSSE, root mean square standardized error. Table S2 Statistical?characteristic of soil heavy metal concentrations (mg kg?1) within different?segments of distance (m) from sampling sites to the main road and river system Factors Distance (m) No. Cu Zn Cr Cd As Hg Road 50 15 55.92±24.98a 161.96±55.87a 91.72±19.51b 0.29±0.10a 9.52±5.11a 0.25±0.11ab 50-100 10 50.11±14.24ab 137.79±26.86b 104.29±19.83a 0.24±0.08ab 5.56±1.89b 0.24±0.10ab 100-500 19 49.30±14.52ab 124.72±26.07b 93.10±11.23ab 0.21±0.06b 5.94±3.37b 0.30±0.11a 500-1000 18 39.81±15.02b 112.53±27.23b 84.63±12.45b 0.21±0.07b 5.30±1.91b 0.25±0.14ab 1000-1500 11 38.05±14.62b 110.91±25.36b 90.33±16.36b 0.19±0.06b 5.02±2.27b 0.25±0.11ab 1500 8 37.41±14.72b 108.46±27.06b 84.47±9.93b 0.18±0.07b 5.26±1.12b 0.20±0.10b River 500 22 51.92±21.96a 146.31±46.40a 96.42±19.66a 0.