企业文化 Martin+-+Organizational+Culture+War+Games+-+2004.docVIP

企业文化 Martin+-+Organizational+Culture+War+Games+-+2004.doc

  1. 1、本文档共67页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
企业文化 Martin+-+Organizational+Culture+War+Games+-+2004.doc

Organizational Culture: Beyond Struggles for Intellectual Dominance* Joanne Martin Stanford University, Peter J. Frost University of British Columbia, and Olivia A. ONeill Stanford University August, 2004 To appear in S. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. Nord, and T. Lawrence, (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, Second edition, London: Sage Publications, forthcoming. *We wish to express our thanks to Cynthia Hardy, Mats Alvesson, and Linda Putnam. All three gave us the kind of constructive, appreciative critique that could serve as the norm for discourse in a more collaborative intellectual environment. Organizational Culture War Games: Beyond Struggles for Intellectual Dominance Joanne Martin, Peter Frost, and Olivia A. ONeill This review is not structured in the usual way -- a departure from tradition that merits an explanation. Literature reviews generally have a linear, often chronological structure, with attention to who was first? The tone is apparently objective and decisively authoritative: this study demonstrated that… The goal is to present the objective truth about what weve learned. The result is an enlightenment tale of cumulative progress, as one original contribution after another builds a deeper and broader understanding than was available before. In a traditionally structured review, intellectual differences of opinion are usually handled with indirection and tact, an approach that helps scholars co-exist in a close-knit field while continuing to have cordial intellectual exchanges. Most often, an author focuses predominantly on one point of view, relegating competing perspectives to brief summaries or the margins of a text (for example, in a parenthetical aside, a separate chapter in a book, or a footnote) or simply not citing them at all. This popular strategy permits full exploration and delineation of a favored point of view, while not creating a need to criticize, or even draw attention to, conflicting perspectives. Whether silence, marginalization

文档评论(0)

czy2014 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档