争议解决针对的两个问题.PPT

  1. 1、本文档共56页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
争议解决针对的两个问题

正常披露(续) Shaw LJ in Lonrbo: “the documents of a subsidiary might be in the power of another ... where on the established facts a company is so utterly subservient or sub-ordinated to the will and the wishes of some other person … that compliance with that other person’s demands can be regarded as assured….” The test was whether the other companies are under the unfettered control of the defendants so as to be their alter egos (Re Tecnion Investments) 正常披露(续) Document not entitled to disclose because of an obligation to a third party (such as, documents disclosed in another arbitration and held it subject to confidentiality/collateral undertaking not to disclose) ; safe way to handle is to list the document in a court action, but refuse to allow inspection or to voluntarily disclose like a privileged document 正常披露(续) D. Duration of disclosure – Continuing duty of disclosure (Vernon v. Bosley (No.2) [1997] 1 All ER 614) and CPR at r.31.11 (until proceedings are concluded); Disclosure by orderly stages; Supplemental disclosure before hearing; Disclosure at the hearing or after hearing but before the Award (agreement of parties or leave of arbitral tribunal); Exceptions of (i) document referred to in cross-examination; (ii) document to discredit Opponent’s witness 正常披露(续) E. 披露的程序(Procedure) Exchange of list of documents ; CPR at r.31.10; must contain concise short description to identify the documents; Listing of [i] documents disclose voluntarily, [ii] documents had been in control but lost control, [iii] documents in control but refuse to allow inspection; Disclosure Statement Inspection (discretion of arbitrator [Whyte Co v. Abrens Co (1884) 50 LT 344]); Right to take copy. 正常披露(续) F. Too many documents in the modern world Disclosure/discovery becoming too expensive and time-consuming; complaint of a useless exercise of shadow-chasing in international arbitration; O M (1996) 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 347 (requirement of “substantial evidential material

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

fengruiling + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档