金融法(双语版)第八章金融衍生产品法律制度.ppt

金融法(双语版)第八章金融衍生产品法律制度.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
一、金融衍生产品简述 二、对金融衍生产品的监督 一、金融衍生产品简述 定义:金融衍生产品(Derivative)是与金融相关的派生物,通常是指其价值依赖于基础资产(underlying assets)价值变动的合约(contracts)。 种类:主要包括远期、期货、互换、期权以及它们与其他金融工具经分解组合形成的混合金融产品。 金融衍生产品的交易可分为场内交易和场外交易。 地位:金融衍生产品是全球金融创新的浪潮中涌现出的高科技产品,是金融创新工具的重要组成部分。 一、金融衍生产品简述 1.中国的金融衍生产品 定义:金融合约 发展特点:起步晚,发展快 现状:场内交易中产品单一,且交易限制较多;场外交易中产品品种丰富,交易的限制较少 对策:借鉴经验和教训,坚持推动金融衍生产品市场的规范发展 一、金融衍生产品简述 2.美国的金融衍生产品 Definition: a type of financial compact ; Amercia is the resource and the leader of the Financial derivatives(1972) Present situation: Profit and crisis coexist in the same(CDS 2008) 一、金融衍生产品简述 3.案例 Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner Smith Inc. v. Curran The central question presented by these cases is whether a private party may maintain an action for damages caused by a violation of the CEA. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit answered that question affirmatively, holding that an investor may maintain an action against his broker for violation of an antifraud provision of the CEA. ?The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit gave the same answer to the question in actions brought by investors claiming damages resulting from unlawful price manipulation that allegedly could have been prevented by the New York Mercantile Exchanges enforcement of its own rules. 一、金融衍生产品简述 3.案例 (1)The formation of the futeres trading market is necessary in that times. The composition of the future trading market is the hedgers,the speculators,the floor brokers and the petitioners. (2)Under the approach to the task of determining whether Congress intended to authorize a private cause of action has changed significantly, federal courts,??following a common-law tradition, regarded the denial of a remedy as the exception rather than the rule.? As Justice Frankfurter explained:Our cases subsequent to Cort v. Ash have plainly stated that our focus must be on the intent of Congress. Through the analysis of this case, the law and the legal precedent, the Justice Frankfu

文档评论(0)

autohhh + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档