国际商务谈判(英文版)Chapter 6 Game Theory Perspective.ppt

国际商务谈判(英文版)Chapter 6 Game Theory Perspective.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Part Ⅰ an Overview of International Business Negotiation Part Ⅰ an Overview of International Business Negotiation Part Ⅰ an Overview of International Business Negotiation Part Ⅰ an Overview of International Business Negotiation International Business Negotiation * Part Ⅱ Negotiation Mechanism Chapter 6: Game Theory Perspective * Key points Fundamentals of game theory and negotiation; Practical applications of game theory for real word negotiation. * Game Theory Assumptions 1. Player’s assumption: ? Players or parties are fully rational. ? Players attempt to maximize their utility/outcome. ? Players will accept the highest payoffs. ? Players will only accept solutions that are at or greater than their security levels (resistance points). ? Players know the rules of the game. ? Players assume other parties to be fully rational. 2. The number of players is fixed and known to all parties. * Game Theory Assumptions 3. Each party recognizes a set of available options and develops tangible preferences among those options. Preferences remain constant throughout the conflict/negotiation interaction. 4. Each party knows or can estimate well the options and preferences of the other parties. 5. Communication is limited, highly controlled, or not relevant to the conflict/negotiation interaction. 6. A decision must be possible that is maximally efficient, i.e., intersects with the solution set at a point that maximizes each partys own interests (Pareto optimal) * The Simplest Game: Two Person with a Fixed Pie we imagine two people facing off against each other. Whatever one wins, the other loses. There is a delicious cake there to be divided. Bob cuts the cake and Neil chooses which piece of cake he will take. As long as both Bob and Neil are interested in maximizing their piece of the cake, Bob has no incentive to cut anything but “fairly.” * More Complicated and Practical Situations They each have two strategies available to them, but the outcome is not just dependent o

文档评论(0)

autohhh + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档